In a noteworthy update to its terms of service, SoundCloud has given itself permission to utilize audio uploaded by users to train artificial intelligence (AI) systems. The change, which seems to have been made without much fanfare, allows the platform to leverage user-generated content to inform and develop AI technologies.
According to the revised terms, which were last amended on February 7, users grant SoundCloud the right to use their content as part of its services, including AI applications. This provision raises significant questions about user consent and intellectual property rights. For instance, the terms explicitly state, “You explicitly agree that your Content may be used to inform, train, develop or serve as input to artificial intelligence or machine intelligence technologies or services as part of and for providing the services.”
SoundCloud does, however, include a clause that acknowledges existing agreements with third-party rights holders, like record labels, which may affect how user content is handled. The platform has existing licensing agreements with both independent and major music labels, including Universal Music and Warner Music Group.
Despite these updates, users are reportedly unable to find a straightforward method to opt-out of this new policy in the site’s settings. SoundCloud’s silence on press inquiries only further complicates the issue.
SoundCloud is not alone in this trend; numerous content platforms have been altering their policies related to AI. In recent months, popular platforms such as X, LinkedIn, and YouTube have introduced terms that facilitate the training of AI on user data, stirring up debates about user rights and the ethical use of their contributions.
Last year, SoundCloud showcased its commitment to integrating AI into its platform through partnerships aimed at providing users with enhanced tools for music creation. These collaborations were intended to improve artist engagement while ensuring rights holders receive appropriate recognition and compensation for their work. The company affirmed its dedication to ethical AI practices that respect artists’ rights amidst growing concerns within the community.
Responding to the backlash regarding the latest policy modifications, SoundCloud provided a statement clarifying their position. The spokesperson emphasized that the platform does not use artist content to develop AI models or permit third parties to exploit SoundCloud content for such purposes. The new terms are described as a means to clarify how AI technologies will interact with content on SoundCloud’s platform, with proposed applications aimed at enhancing user experience through personalized recommendations and improved content detection.
As SoundCloud navigates this evolving landscape, the central focus remains on supporting human artists, ensuring that future AI implementations are developed to enhance creative opportunities rather than overshadow them. The emerging debates on user rights in the context of AI warrant careful consideration, pushing for ongoing dialogue within the community as this technology continues to advance.
For artists and listeners alike, the question that remains is how these developments will reshape the music landscape in the age of AI. More importantly, who truly owns the content when it is utilized to teach AI algorithms? Understanding the implications of these changes will be vital for artists and users as the platform continues to innovate.